Logo
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Services
  • Insights
DeutschContact us
HomeThe FirmServicesInsightsDeutschContact us

INTERPOL Red Notice Despite Asylum or Refugee Status?

Request a confidential consultation
  1. Services
  2. /
  3. INTERPOL
  4. /
  5. INTERPOL Red Notice Despite Asylum or Refugee Status?

By Dr. Julius Hagen, Attorney at Law

Short answer

  • Where a person’s refugee status is confirmed to INTERPOL, the INTERPOL Refugee Resolution may, subject to its conditions, support deletion of a Notice or Diffusion issued by the state in which the person fears persecution.
  • A pending asylum claim is not the same as confirmed refugee recognition. Protection status, data source, political persecution and the specific INTERPOL measure must therefore be assessed separately.
  • The CCF can review the processing of data in INTERPOL’s Information System. It does not decide national police records or whether extradition is permissible.

What refugee status changes within INTERPOL

INTERPOL’s General Assembly formally endorsed its refugee policy through Resolution GA-2017-86-RES-09. Subject to national law and confidentiality requirements, member countries are encouraged to inform INTERPOL or the CCF when refugee status is granted and when an asylum application has been decided. The INTERPOL Refugee Resolution therefore addresses the processing of international police alerts. It is not an automatic deletion rule, does not replace a national asylum decision and does not determine the criminal merits of the allegation.

Emergency contact

Choose the fastest way to reach our team about an urgent legal matter.

+49 152 92633530
CallTelegramTelegramWhatsAppWhatsApp

The review looks beyond the label

The relevant facts include the exact protection status, the country in which persecution is feared, the source of the data and the basis for the Notice or Diffusion. The refugee decision, asylum-file documents, any indication of a national arrest warrant and the chronology of flight, asylum proceedings, criminal proceedings and the international alert may all matter.

Article 3: political persecution and ordinary-law crime

Article 3 of INTERPOL’s Constitution prohibits the Organization from engaging in activities of a political, military, religious or racial character. The assessment is case-specific. Political pressure, a change of government or a person’s position in exile are important facts, but do not alone establish that a Notice is impermissibly political. Conversely, an allegation labelled corruption or a commercial offence may be used for political purposes. INTERPOL describes this as a comparison between the ordinary-law character of the case and its political elements. The official Article 3 materials provide the starting point for that assessment.

Documents and information to preserve now

  • The decision granting refugee status or the documents available from the asylum proceedings
  • Any indication of a Red Notice, Diffusion, border check or arrest, together with all documents received
  • The national arrest warrant, judicial basis and procedural chronology, where available
  • Do not provide information to the persecuting state or make travel decisions before the concrete risks have been assessed

Deletion from INTERPOL does not resolve every national risk

The CCF reviews only whether data processing in INTERPOL’s Information System complies with INTERPOL’s rules. A deletion there does not decide national files, bilateral information channels, a national extradition case or how a particular border state will respond. An application should therefore address the INTERPOL record and the national or extradition risks in parallel. The CCF’s current procedural information explains access, correction and deletion requests and the limits of the Commission’s competence.

Table of Contents
What refugee status changes within INTERPOL
The review looks beyond the label
Article 3: political persecution and ordinary-law crime
Deletion from INTERPOL does not resolve every national risk
Dr. Julius Hagen

Dr. Julius Hagen

Julius represents clients in criminal matters, white-collar investigations, extradition proceedings and INTERPOL matters. He consults in English and German.

Related topics

CCF Request before INTERPOL
We handle access, correction, restriction and deletion requests concerning INTERPOL data.
Politically Motivated INTERPOL Notices
We assess political persecution, the procedural context and Article 3 of the INTERPOL Constitution.
Human Rights and Due Process
We assess human-rights and due-process objections to INTERPOL measures.
Extradition Despite Asylum or Refugee Status
We separate the INTERPOL issue from the independent assessment of extradition proceedings in Germany.

Discuss INTERPOL and asylum

Tell us which protection status was granted, the country concerned, any indication of a Red Notice or Diffusion and which documents are available.

Drag & drop files here or browse

PDF, DOC, DOCX, JPG, PNG (max 10MB per file, up to 5 files)

* Required fields

Contact Information

info@rh-legal.de

Berlin

  • Fasanenstr. 15, 10623 Berlin
  • +49 3075 438452
  • +49 3075 438476

Düsseldorf

  • Couvenstr. 4, 40211 Düsseldorf
  • +49 2119 7632101
  • +49 2119 7632103

About

RATH HAGEN Rechtsanwälte is a German law firm with offices in Berlin and Düsseldorf. We advise and represent companies and private clients in Germany and beyond, particularly in international criminal proceedings, extradition and INTERPOL matters, global mobility, immigration and citizenship law.

info@rh-legal.de

Our Services

  • Criminal Lawyer in Germany
  • White Collar Crime in Germany
  • Extradition Defence
  • INTERPOL
  • Migration & Global Mobility
  • Citizenship and Naturalisation
  • Berlin

    Fasanenstr. 15, 10623 Berlin
    +49 3075 438452
    +49 3075 438476
  • Düsseldorf

    Couvenstr. 4, 40211 Düsseldorf
    +49 2119 7632101
    +49 2119 7632103
Rath Hagen Rechtsanwälte
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Imprint
  • Deutsch